Banking
on HR......A
new People centric approach in Banks
Shuchi Sanon
MBA-IT (Sem-I)
|
|
If
you think banking is all about money. Think again. Banking is all about
people. People behind the counters and people in front of the counters.
Why
is HR so important?
It
is pertinent to ponder over the fact that why HR assumes such a crucial
role in today’s organizational scenario despite the massive advancement
in the field of IT. Perhaps that this is the only resource, which gives
meaning significance and validation to all resource. While all other
resources depreciate over time HR appreciates through use. It’s so powerful
that it can make or mar. It is like a sharp knife that can be used for
either for some good or for some evil purpose.
Importance of HR in Banking
HR
plays a vital role in organizational effectiveness. No matter how sophisticated
and modern business activities are it becomes difficult to sustain its
growth & effectiveness unless human resources are complementary
to its operations. This is more important to a service industry like
banking where continuous improvement is a must to meet the rising expectations
of the customers. Here the role of the seller is pivotal in driving
ultimate satisfaction of the customer. This casts a spell on the customer
and that experience will go a long way in shaping the future of the
relationship banking has. With a positive frame of mind the employee
will be in a position to anticipate customer needs and accordingly satisfy
the same.
What
is HRM in banking?
HRM
in the context of banking is not only acquisition of new knowledge and
skills but also acquiring capabilities to manage both internal and external
environment attaining self confidence and motivation for public service.
Performance
of any individual is a function of his/her own ability and willingness.
While ability is functional of skill development and knowledge generation,
willingness is a function of attitude.
Looking
back
In
early seventies the banks main focus of attention was that of opening
more n more new branches and growth of their business. It mostly “targeted
banking”. Consolidation and motivation were not considered the growth
during this period was due to mass expansion of branches, massive recruitment
of manpower and huge promotion of employees and officers at all levels.
Due
to this quantitative approach certain natural corollaries occurred as:
Towards
better Management
Some
associate banks made an excellent beginning by initiating a number of
innovations in personal function like:
Revitalizing
training System
Training
efforts redirected to personal growth, and making it performance and
development oriented
Around
1979, state bank of India set up a formal HRD department at central
and local head office level
OCTAPAC
culture
A
close analysis and survey of the initiatives taken by banks like job
rotation, promotion, transfer, training and customer services; it was
realized that banks would be effective only when there was a transparent
climate in the organization. Dr. Udai Prateek suggested that HRD is
incompatible with the culture of authoritaritism, secrecy
and avoidance of conflicts. He suggested the OCTAPAC culture
O-openness
C-collaboration
T-trust
A-authenticity
(doing what is expressed in words by top management)
P=pro-actions
(taking initiatives)
A-
autonomy
C
– Confrontation with problems
THE
LONG AWAITED SHIFT
Traditionally
the major chunks of banking activities were on routine, repetitive,
and regulated with very little scope for innovation, creativity and
challenge. It was labour intensive. Come technology and the face of
banking wore a different look. The mundane drudgery of digits has been
given by. It has become knowledge intensive. With the back office functions
now taking a back seat, the demand for computer literacy, communication
skills have become predominant. PSU banks have now started to brace
the core banking idea.
With
the large-scale computerization & various technological advancements
there is an excess of manpower in these organizations. Strategies towards
deployment of manpower and further slimming of the work force are being
taken. This is as even though manpower is crucial in this kind of industry,
it has become redundant and hence ‘rightsizing’ became essential. Reduction
of one lakh employees have been done through VRS scheme, but this also
has acted as a demotivating factor for those who have been staying on
in the organizations.
The
challenge now is to enhance the quality of existing manpower by inducing
in them new skills so that they would work with the zeal required to
come to power with the new young blood entering in the organization.
The paradox now is that with the wake of globalization, the best cost
effective, convienent way to do with this pressing issue is ‘outsourcing’
which has given way to freelancers.
But
is it a panacea? The question relates to the effectiveness of the process—whether
it is capable of delivering the value added operations, and can we afford
to do away with the total belongingness of the processes.
What
appears to be a more plausible alternative is to identify three tier
of workforce through proper scanning:
1.
Core Worker
Core
Worker represents that part of the workforce that is both able and willing
to champion the cause of the management. These people directly contribute
to the growth & development of the organization. This section should
be strengthened by various motivational measures to ensure their long-term
loyalty and commitment towards the organizational goal, throughout their
service life.
2.
Peripheral Worker
Peripheral
Workers are those who shudder to enter into the mainstream functions.
Their risk appetite is very low and they prefer to remain in the comfortable
realm of their own periphery. They are bereft of any strong desire to
excel. Measures can be taken to bring forth their latent capabilities
may be taken like posting them to areas of challenging tasks so as to
convert them into core workers.
3.
Outworker
An
outworker is suitable for those types of job in the organization that
does not require much of intervention in the decision making of the
organization, like stereotype jobs. Their performance needs to be evaluated
periodically to decide on their suitability of their job.
However
the major emphasis should be laid on development of the core worker
by ensuring life long security by: